In defamation cases there is always a fine line between what is defamatory (a false fact) and what is merely opinion, albeit offensive. This fall the Virginia Supreme court will attempt to thread this needle in Cashion v. Smith where some of the allegedly non-defamatory (opinion) statements were “”He could have made it with better resuscitation”; “This was a very poor effort”; “You didn’t really try”; “You gave up on him”; “You determined from the beginning that he wasn’t going to make it and purposefully didn’t resuscitate him.” This could substantively alter Virginia’s law of defamation and might offer more opportunities to sue for scurrilous statements that used to be protected as “opinion.”
Categories
Archives
- June 2015
- May 2015
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- May 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005